Anti-Feminist Feminism: The Rise of the Subversive State

Challenging the prevailing narratives of sexual liberation and gender equality of pseudo feminism is this acknowledgment that the sexual revolution has undermined both women’s well-being and societal structures , this is epitomized by thinkers like Louise Perry, who argue that the globalist left leaning state and elites have subverted society, that modern feminism is in fact not interested in women’s well being but in manipulating women to achieve left wing political goals.

The Case Against the Sexual Revolution

Louise Perry’s seminal work, The Case Against the Sexual Revolution, critiques the 1960s-era movement that sought to liberate women through sexual autonomy. Drawing from her experiences in a rape crisis center, Perry contends that feminism and the sexual revolution overlooked the inherent biological and psychological differences between men and women:

• Men and women experience sexual relationships differently. Men generally pursue short-term casual sex with fewer emotional consequences, while women are generally more oriented toward emotional bonding, security and reproductive considerations. Modern Liberal (marxist) feminism is prescriptive downplaying biological and psychological differences between men and women.

• Casual sex, the assumption that sexual liberation and casual sex automatically equate to empowerment for women is wrong as by observation we see that it often leaves women vulnerable to regret, emotional harm, and exploitation.

• These outcomes are not a matter of moral judgment for Perry but an observation about the real-world effects of cultural norms on women.These differences influence behavior, relationship outcomes, and even political preferences.

While men may benefit from a culture of casual sex, women often face emotional and physical repercussions, including increased vulnerability to exploitation and a diminished sense of self-worth. When society treats male and female sexual drives as identical, it can produce outcomes harmful to women, such as emotional stress, social pressure, or relational instability.

A New Feminist Paradigm v. The Subversive State

The role of the globalist state and its left-wing societal institutions is fundamental in understanding modern feminism. The state’s endorsement of liberal sexual norms emphasizing sexual freedom and detachment has contributed to the undermining and erosion of traditional structures that once provided stability and protection for women and children. This “subversive state” has promoted policies and cultural shifts that are detrimental to most women, to family cohesion, and children’s well-being.

The polarization between men and women as a result of Marxist victimhood propaganda, which sought to shame and portray women as exploited slaves if they were housewives looking after their house and children, had the effect of breaking up traditional harmonic family relationships, increasing divorce rates and single-parent households with all the issues this creates against the healthy upbringing of children and fertility.

A bonus for the subversive state was that these divorced women turned more left-leaning after divorce. Another bonus of encouraging and propagandizing women to neglect their family and seek careers instead, is that capitalist big-money corporations and entities were supplied with an increase in the labour force, which lowered wages, this led to a situation where now two people have to work for the wages one person used to bring home.

Women, Empathy, and Political Tendencies

Exploring the psychological traits that shape women’s political behavior we find that they are particularly susceptible to undermining by leftist political narratives :

Women are be more inclined toward left-wing ideologies due to certain psychological and emotional traits. Women’s greater empathy and concern for the vulnerable—traits associated with the “care/harm” foundation in moral psychology—tend to make them more receptive to political movements that emphasize compassion and social justice. Additionally, women tend to be more risk-averse and neurotic, which can make them more susceptible to political narratives that highlight threats and dangers. Perry also points out that women are more likely to engage in collective emotional experiences, such as social movements, due to their higher susceptibility to social contagion.

Globalism’s Exploitation of Feminine Traits

It is no coincidence that proponents of open borders have sought female electoral support by presenting economic migrants as vulnerable “refugees” and promoting the demonstrably false claim that “diversity is our strength.” This strategy represents a calculated manipulation of natural feminine inclinations for political gain.

Women evolutionarily tend to be more empathetic and attuned to the vulnerability of others, particularly toward children and those perceived as defenseless. This caring instinct, which has served crucial survival functions throughout human history, can make women more receptive to policies or political movements that emphasize protection, compassion, and social welfare. Globalist movements have weaponized this natural empathy, framing their agenda in humanitarian terms while obscuring the real consequences of mass migration: increased crime, cultural fragmentation, strain on social services, and the displacement of native populations.

The propaganda apparatus presents heart-wrenching images of suffering families while systematically suppressing evidence of the predominantly young male demographic of migrants, the security risks they pose (crime, systemic rape cultures) , and the economic burden they create. By appealing to women’s protective instincts, globalists have successfully secured female votes for policies that ultimately harm the very communities and families women naturally seek to protect.

This represents a behavioral pattern rather than an absolute rule. Women are not inherently aligned to any particular political ideology, nor are they incapable of critical thinking. However, emotional appeals that bypass rational analysis have proven particularly effective when targeted at natural caregiving impulses. The success of this strategy demonstrates how understanding biological predispositions can be exploited for political manipulation, turning women’s greatest strength—their capacity for empathy—into a vulnerability that undermines their own interests and those of their societies.

The Rise of a New Feminist Paradigm

In reaction to modern pseudo-feminism—characterized by Marxist-leaning approaches that exploit women for political agendas—a new feminist paradigm is emerging. This form of feminism emphasizes the value of traditional social structures, such as monogamy, marriage, and the nuclear family, arguing that these institutions provide women with a stable framework for personal growth, emotional security, and societal respect.

Unlike strands of contemporary feminism that prioritize ideological goals over lived realities, this approach is rooted in secular reasoning and draws on empirical evidence from psychology, sociology, and evolutionary studies. It examines how human relationships, parenting, and social bonds contribute to overall well-being and challenges the prevailing assumptions of the sexual revolution, which often portrayed traditional norms as inherently oppressive.

This new paradigm represents a deliberate shift in feminist discourse. Rather than viewing family-oriented values as limiting, it views them as empowering tools for women to achieve fulfillment and influence within both private and public spheres. By advocating a reevaluation of feminism itself, this perspective contests the dominant liberal feminist narrative and encourages a more nuanced conversation about the intersection of freedom, responsibility, and societal cohesion based on evidence and observation.