Globalism’s New World Order

Senior Decorated U.S. Intelligence Officer provides the context for globalism and political correctness.

This is definetely the most important report you could read to understand the forces impacting your future, it involves open borders, political correctness, globalism, the lockdowns , the deep state, academia & the violent swing to a Marxist left, Extremist Islamism, including the covid experimental ‘vaccines’, the report is curated to make it more understandable to a wide audience.

The reason I share this information is to enable you to identify the enemy therefore stripping their ability to control you, personally as a political & social scientist I believe that people do not understand the extend/intensity of their social animal nature and how that makes them susceptible to manipulation.

We’re at war, the storm is upon us:

War can be physical or Political Warfare which is a Maoist Insurgency concept that recognizes the
role narratives (psyops) play in overwhelming rule of law societies.
It uses cultural level (norms) narratives that trickle down into the political space where fidelity to the narrative will result in non-enforcement of law that, over time, becomes institutionalized.

Political correctness is a set of narratives that are amplified by mass media as socially acceptable (norms) , these narratives are Marxist ideals or goals in furtherance of Marxism.

‘The establishment and their media enablers exert control over this nation through means that are very well known. Anyone who challenges their control is deemed a sexist, a racist, a xenophobe, and morally deformed. President Trump, Oct 2016.

The benefactors of this political warfare include; Urban Real Estate who depend greatly on immigrant tenants, International Banking who seeks to maintain US debtor status so as to control the application of American power, and elements of the business sector that depend upon immigrant labor or government infrastructure, hedge funds with links to China, billionaire elites favouring the slavery of commodifying global labour for wealth, large scale crony Capitalists like ‘vaccine’ Gates.

Political correctness is a weapon against reason and critical thinking. This weapon functions as the enforcement mechanism of diversity narratives that seek to implement cultural Marxism.

Candidate Trump’s rhetoric in the campaign not only cut through the Marxist narrative, he did so in ways that were viscerally comprehensible to a voting bloc that then made candidate Trump the
president; making that bloc self-aware in the process.

Trump Dereangment Syndrom: Recognizing in candidate Trump an existential threat to cultural Marxist memes that dominate the prevailing cultural narrative, those that benefit recognize the threat he poses and seek his destruction. For this cabal, Trump must be destroyed. Far from politics as usual, this is a political warfare effort that seeks the destruction of a president.

Have you wondered where do all these leftist troublemakers tearing down status etc come from? Another tactic involves political activists to meet the people where they are. Through gentle nudges over time, passive participants become active. At first, a target may only be asked to sign a petition
or provide an email or mailing address. From that point, the subject becomes the recipient of sustained communications related to the issues of the originating petition. While an individual may not be polit-
ically active, that person through the supporting consumption of mass market media will become more susceptible to activist messaging and discontent. The overarching goal of this line of effort is the
development and reinforcement of a mass norms and activism as it builds the counter-state within the state; complete with its own bundle of replacement legal, cultural, and social norms that operate in parallel with that of the host culture’s.

After you finish reading this article consider visiting : https://unconstrainedanalytics.org/

ISLAMOPHOBIA – When we take a look at the muslim brotherhood’s main strategy to defeat the west,
that strategy is to just ride on the Marxist narrative system that the left created in the 1980s, they saw
that this racism, sexism, homophobia issue would bring down the west, and they just came up with the word islamophobia and inserted it into the collection of narratives.

When you hear a general with combat responsibilities say, political correctness gets in the way of my doing my job, what he just told you was it was more important for him to be politically correct than to keep your sons and daughters alive and to win the war.

I think it is super important to understand that that is what political correctness is and that has to become the number one objective here to look at, because it is through narratives they seek to win the war.

The organization of security and cooperation in europe (osce) is an official formal international gathering that the u.s. participates and sends a formal delegation, so this is a diplomatic official event. The people on the left who helped craft the islamophobia narrative and the turkish delegation that was there representing the ioc, we got them to admit that the word islamophobia has no definition, in a very conference where the effort was to criminalize people engaging in islamophobia, now, i think people laugh at that, because i’m a lawyer, what is the consequences of deliberately constructing a term that has no meaning, but can be used to prosecute people if it doesn’t mean we’re going to go after you for the things you say, we’ll figure out whether it works and bankrupt you in the process.

This is a war that is intended to be fought at the political warfare level through control of
speech, these narratives are being enforced through what are called the hate speech narratives designed to suppress your speech.
All these things that will be used to really destroy your free speech rights will be stated in facially neutral language when you just read it, you don’t really get the sense of what it is saying, it sounds neutral, it sounds harmless. it is only when you see how it starts to take effect that you realize this is a real attack on speech. a real attack on speech that is designed to intimidate you. it is designed to intimidate you and to shutting your mouth, We are being controlled by narratives.

The enemy’s main effort is a sustained strategic information campaign at the political warfare level. what is the objective? to win the war by denying you the ability to identify them, thereby allowing them to control you.

The Left focuses on cultural and institutional power by communicating its ideological initiatives in terms of “values” while targeting the placement of cadre throughout the mass line so they can enable those
“values” by converting them first to norms, then to policy, and finally to law.

What is popularly called “fake news” and the “deep-state” are better understood as propaganda and the counter-state. Transitioning to a political warfare analysis, one begins to discern methods, processes and directionality that terms like “fake news” and “deep-state” do not capture. By their nature, media terms like “fake news” and “deep-state” ensure that analysis remains fixed on the surface of events.

Our aversion to recognizing threats beyond the strictly military, especially ideological threats in the political warfare arena, has long been recognized by the west’s and America’s foes as an exploitable strategic level vulnerability.

The Left uses dialectically determined political warfare concepts to drive a core set of narratives that inter-operate at the tactical level while integrating at the strategic. Narratives are associated with the
pseudorealities (or second realities) they seek to establish and enforce, They are called narratives because they are stories/fictions that seek to supplant the real with the unreal. These narratives are directional, they have velocity, and are always oriented on a target.

Historically, the left progressed from the Hegelian dialectic, to Marx, to Wilson’s progressivism,
to the early Frankfurt School, to Mao’s Long March, to Marcuse’s thoughts on tolerance, to political correctness.

The Opposition – The Enemy. While opposition to President Trump manifests itself through political warfare memes centered on cultural Marxist narratives, this hardly means that opposition is limited to Marxists as conventionally understood. Having become the dominant cultural meme, some benefit from it while others are captured by it; including “deep state” actors, globalists, bankers, lslamists, and establishment Republicans.

Through the campaign, candidate Trump tapped into a deep vein of concern among many
citizens that America is at risk and is slipping away. Globalists and lslamists recognize that for their
visions to succeed, America, both as an ideal and as a national and political identity, must be destroyed.
Atomization of society must also occur at the individual level; with attacks directed against all levels of
group and personal identity, Hence the sexism, racism and xenophobia memes. As a Judea-Christian
culture, forced inclusion of post-modern notions of tolerance is designed to induce nihilistic
contradictions that reduce all thought, all faith, all loyalties to meaninglessness.

Group rights (identity politics) based on sex or ethnicity are a direct assault on the very idea of individual human rights and natural law around which the Constitution was framed. “Transgender acceptance” memes attack at the most basic level by denying a person the right to declare the biological fact of one’s sex. When a population has 2 + 2 = 5 imposed on it, there are many that benefit:
• Mainstream Media -The principle mechanism for implementing narratives.
• The Academy– Academia has served as a principle counter-state node for some time and
remains a key conduit for creating future adherents to cultural Marxist narratives and their
derivative worldview.
• The Deep State – The successful outcome of cultural Marxism is a bureaucratic state beholden
to no one, certainly not the American people . With no rule of law considerations outside those
that further deep state power, the deep state truly becomes, as Hegel advocated, god
bestriding the earth.
• Global Corporatists & Bankers – Exploitation of populations, unfettered by national protections
and notions of personal morality and piety.
• Democratic Leadership – The democratic leadership has been a counter-state enabler that
executes, sustains, and protects cultural Marxist programs of action and facilitates the
relentless expansion of the deep state.
• Republican Leadership – More afraid of being accused of being called a racist, sexist,
homophobe or lslamophobe than of failing to enforce their oaths to “support and defend the
Constitution,” the Republican Establishment accepts and enforces cultural Marxist memes
within its own sphere of operations. In doing so, knowingly or not, it becomes an agent of that.
These “conservatives” become increasingly indistinguishable from their democratic counter-
parts save that they misrepresent themselves to their constituents . Lacking the discernment to
recognize their situation, and eager to benefit from the election cheating mechanism, they will work with globalists, corporatists, and the international financial interests and will likewise service the deep state. These establishment Republicans are the hard left’s designated defeat mechanism in the destruction of the old regime as well as the American ideal.

Because candidate Trump publicly exposed them for their duplicitous activities, they are at risk as long as Trump can turn on them and are, therefore, bitter foes.

lslamists – Islamists ally with cultural Marxist because, as far back as the 1980s, they properly
assessed that the hard left has a strong chance of reducing Western civilization to its benefit.
Having co-opted post-modern narratives as critical points, Isla mists deploy these narrative to
strategically blind and then control US decision makers. This is by design and purposeful. “By
their own hands!” has been the declared strategy of the Muslim Brotherhood since 1991. This
strategy seeks to divide American society against itself with the forced imposition of Isla mist
objectives on one half of American society by the other half. Once a society has been effectively
atomized, the population will have lost its faith in the old order, detest those who reduced it,
and divide along the lines of narrative adherence. This is the intended outcome of hostile
information cum political warfare campaigns and today we see their effects on American
society.

Political Warfare Attacks -A Primer. As used here, “political warfare” does not concern activities
associated with the American political process but rather exclusively refers to political warfare as
understood by the Maoist Insurgency model. 2 Political warfare is one of the five components of a Maoist insurgency. Maoist methodologies employ synchronized violent and non-violent actions that focus on mobilization of individuals and groups to action. This approach envisions the direct use of non-violent operational arts and tactics as elements of combat power. In Maoist insurgencies, the formation of a counter-state is essential to seizing state power. Functioning as a hostile competing state acting within an existing state, it has an alternate infrastructure. Political warfare operates as one of the activities of the “counter-state” and is primarily focused on the resourcing and mobilization of the counter state or the exhaustion and demobilization of the targeted political movement. Political warfare methods can be implemented at strategic, operational, or tactical levels of operation.
Political warfare is warfare. Strategic information campaigns designed to delegitimize through
disinformation arise out of non-violent lines of effort in political warfare regimes. They principally
operate through narratives. Because the left is aligned with lslamist organizations at local, national and
international levels, recognition should be given to the fact that they seamlessly interoperate through
coordinated synchronized interactive narratives.

Cultural Marxism – A Primer. While the attacks on President Trump arise out of political warfare
considerations based on non-kinetic lines of effort (as discussed below), they operate in a battle-space
prepared, informed and conditioned by cultural Marxist drivers. In practical terms, the political warfare
assault on President Trump cannot be separated from the cultural Marxist narratives that drive them.
From an operational preparation of the environment perspective, President Trump is operating in a
battle-space that reflects the left’s vision.

Post-modern (diversity/multiculturalism) narratives seeks to implement cultural Marxist objectives
can be demonstrated by reference to founding Frankfurt School theorist Herbert Marcuse’s repurposing
of the term tolerance. In a 1965 ~ Marcuse defined tolerance as intolerance; said it can be
implemented through undemocratic means to stop chauvinism (xenophobia), racism, discrimination;
and should be extended to the left while denied to the right:
• “The realization of the objective of tolerance would call for intolerance toward prevailing policies, attitudes, opinions, and the extension of tolerance to policies, attitudes, and opinions which are outlawed or suppressed.”
• “Surely, no government can be expected to foster its own subversion, but in a democracy such a right is vested in the people (i.e. in the majority of the people). This means that the ways should not be blocked on which a subversive majority could develop, and if they are blocked by organized repression and indoctrination, their reopening may require apparently undemocratic means. They would include the withdrawal of toleration of speech and assembly from groups and movements which promote aggressive policies, armament, chauvinism, discrimination on the grounds of race and religion,
or which oppose the extension of public services, social security, medical care, etc.” (8-9)
• “Liberating tolerance, then, would mean intolerance against movements from the Right and toleration of movements from
the Left. As to the scope of this tolerance and intolerance: … it would extend to the stage of action as well as of discussion and propaganda, of deed as well as of word.”
It is through such post-modern constructs that interoperable narratives are established among various
left-wing groups as well as between them and Isla mist groups at all levels. For example, from the 2001
Conference of Foreign Ministers at Bamako, Mali, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) declared its commitment to fight racism and xenophobia and then declared lslamophobia a “contemporary form of racism”:
• In this context, the World Conference urges all states … take all necessary measures to combat hatred, discrimination, intolerance and acts of violence, intimidation and coercion motivated by racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance particularly against Islam
• Racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance which display an increasing trend, in their most subtle and contemporary forms, constitute a violation of human rights. 3. Contemporary forms of racism are based on discrimination and disparagement on a cultural, rather than biological basis. In this content, the increasing trend of lslamophobia, as a distinct form of xenophobia in non-Muslim societies is very alarming.
That the OIC made these claims as part of its planned inputs to the United Nation’s “Third World
Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance” further
demonstrates the coordinated and interoperable nature of these narratives at international levels in
international forums.

As cultural Marxist narratives intensify, they are to be further operationalized in the form of hate speech
narratives. Hate speech narratives are non-random, coordinated, and fully interoperable escalations of
cultural Marxist memes. Key international players include the European Union, the UN, and the OSCE,
the OIC and the International Muslim Brotherhood. Hate speech memes are structured, coordinated,
and implemented through these same international forums. They involve close coordination with media
and social media and include the Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) narratives. David Shipler’s book
Freedom of Speech provides a road map for how hate speech narratives are to be structured, deployed
and enforced.

Battlespace. These attack narratives are pervasive, full spectrum and institutionalized at all levels. They
operate in social media, television, the 24-hour news cycle in all media, and are entrenched at the upper
levels of the bureaucracies and within the foreign policy establishment. They inform the entertainment
industry from late night monologues, to situation comedies, to television series memes, to movie
themes. The effort required to direct this capacity at President Trump is little more than a programming
decision to do so. The cultural Marxist narrative is fully deployed, pervasive, full spectrum and ongoing.
Regarding the president, attacks have become a relentless 24/7 effort.
While there is certainly a Marxist agenda and even lslamist motivations that must be seriously
addressed in their own right, these motivations alone seem inadequate to explain the scope and
magnitude of the effort directed against the president. The economic drivers behind the Marxist and
Islamist ideologues are enormously influential and seek to leverage these ideological movements for
their own self interests. While beyond the actual scope of this document, the benefactors of these
political movements include; Urban Real Estate who depend greatly on immigrant tenants, International Banking who seeks to maintain US debtor status so as to control the application of American power, and elements of the business sector that depend upon immigrant labor or government infrastructure. The overall objective of these economic forces is the forced urbanization of the populace, thereby necessitating a larger, more powerful government. In summary, this is a form of population control by certain business cartels in league with cultural Marxists/corporatists/lslamists who will leverage Islamic terrorism threats to justify the creation of a police state.
Adversary Campaign Plan.

The effort directed at President Trump is executed along one overt, as well as two covert, lines of effort:
• The overt line of effort is PUBLICITY. Publicity is the straightforward projection of a case that
builds a picture in the audience’s mind designed to garner support. It is facts without context
and information the adversary wants the audience to possess that creates an impression and
sets conditions. It seeks to establish good will and receptiveness to additional inputs.
• There are two covert lines of effort: PROPOGANDA and INFILTRATION/SUBVERSION.
Propaganda is the deliberate direction, even manipulation, of information to secure a
definite outcome. It is an attempt to direct the thinking of the recipient, without his
conscious collaboration, into predetermined channels that are established in the
Publicity line of effort. It is the unwitting conditioning of the recipient by devious
methods with an ulterior motive that seeks to move them incrementally over time into
greater belief and acceptance of message transmitted in the Publicity line of effort.
o Infiltration and subversion operate internal to the targeted organization in order to
inform, target, coordinate, and amplify the effects of the publicity and propaganda.
Both operate to gather intelligence, obstruct legitimate courses of action, provide inside
information, and leak sensitive information that undermines the leadership and
suppresses the morale of friendly elements. Infiltration of political and social groups within a target state is done for the purpose of extending counter- state influence and control. The endgame is concealed and may involve illicit activities.
Subversion undermines or detaches the loyalties of significant political and social groups within the target state and transfers political and/or ideological loyalties to the counter-state. As the counter-state forms, a counter-elite of influential individual and key leaders within the target state will later facilitate the legitimacy and permanency of the new regime.
Political warfare employs both publicity and propaganda. It recognizes no intrinsic virtue in the news but
rather envisions it as a mechanism to exploit and build up support. From a political warfare perspective,
control of the news cycle is the most potent means of attracting and building up a favorable audience.
As it relates to the news cycle, publicity and propaganda can be merged to form a “pseudo-publicity”
that is presented as news in furtherance of sustaining pseudo-realities maintained by cultural Marxist
memes. Pseudo-publicity treatment of President Trump dominates the news cycle. The current
campaign against President Trump operates in the following manner:
The Meta Narrative. Meta narratives seeks to delegitimize President Trump, his administration, and the
vision of America he projected as a candidate. With cultural Marxist memes serving as the backdrop,
President Trump is to be relentlessly characterized as unfit through the use of supporting narratives
acting to move unwitting populations to belief in the meta narrative. Hence:
• “President Trump is illegitimate”
• “President Trump is corrupt”
• “President Trump is dishonest”
Note that the twitter accounts and mainstream media personalities pushing this narrative have seen
their audience numbers rise greatly in the past 6 months. This is a direct result of the supporting and
backdrop narratives channeling individuals to this meta-narrative.
Supporting Narratives. Meta-narratives are supported by an ongoing series supporting-narratives that
can be swapped out as circumstances warrant. It is important to recognize that these stories do not
have to be true, valid or accurate to serve their purpose. Over time, deserved or not, the cumulative
effect of these supporting narratives will result in a Trump fatigue. From a political warfare perspective,
President Trump’s inability to meet this challenge will cast him as a weak failed leader. The current list
of supporting narratives include:
• “Russia hacked the election” – illegitimate
• “Obstruction of Justice” – corrupt
• “Hiding Collusion” – dishonest
• “Putin Puppet” – treasonous
Backdrop Narratives. The backdrop to the meta and supporting narratives are cultural Marxist memes
designed to sustain a general sense of loathing of President Trump and the America that elected him.
Hence:
• “[meta] President Trump is illegitimate, [supporting] he was elected because of Russian
hacking, [backdrop] and besides, he a racist, sexist xenophobe.”

Adversaries utilize these interlocking narratives as a defensive political and information warfare screen
that silences critics and smears supporters of President Trump. When people in the media question the
behavior, actions and decisions of the Trump Administration’s opponents, they are immediately said to
be “working for the Russians” or “supporting Russian propaganda.” Individual Americans who support
the President are deemed “deplorable” and “racist.”
End State. Attacks on President Trump are not just about destroying him, but also about destroying the
vision of America that lead to his election. Those individuals and groups seeking the destruction of
President Trump actually seek to suffocate the vision of America that made him president. Hence, the
end state is not just a delegitimized, destabilized, immobilized and possibly destroyed presidency; but
also a demoralized movement composed of a large enough bloc to elect a president that subsequently
become self-aware of its own disenfranchisement.

After reading this article consider visiting : https://unconstrainedanalytics.org/